George Galloway has been asking, Why can't we all oppose both anti-Semitism and Islamophobia? It seems to me that a better question would be, Why aren't we kind to Everyone? (Closely followed by, Why aren't we kind to every sentient being?). An answer *might* be, Because we are nasty.
I wonder if we will ever conclude that almost all violence, aggression and nastiness, originates from fear, whether that fear be affecting still a violent 30yr old criminal who was beaten or similarly humiliated as a child, or affecting as now our increasingly poorly educated and unequal and mean-spirited island nation who have been told repeatedly that foreign people are going to steal our sweets, our females, our holiday money, our jobs, etc.
And come to think of it, aren't all nations island nations? And what reasonably could be considered kind or helpful about the process, and the result, of determining that we are us, and you are not? We are humans and you are animals; we are Catholics and you are Protestants; we are Christians and you are Jews / Muslims / Jains / Atheists; we are white-skinned, but your skin is of any other colour?
I don't think we are inherently nasty, by the way, but I do think we have acquired a long lasting and often non-specific distrust of strangers. And I'm pretty confident that ignorance is what causes most of our distrust.
Why? Because generally a stranger about whom we gain adequate knowledge can no longer be considered a stranger. Can they.
Recently I've read that a significant number of anthropologists now consider that human nature is not to be nasty, but to work for the common good, to be kind, to be helpful. When we are misled and ill-informed we fail in this, and then we produce and follow an excess of freaks, weirdos, Hitlers, fuckwits and Farridges.
- ▼ 2015 (12)
- ► 2014 (19)
- ► 2012 (22)
- ► 2011 (22)
- ► 2010 (48)
- ► 2009 (49)